Product Comparison＃
This page provides a comparison of Wormhole’s transfer products: Connect, Native Token Transfers (NTT), and Token Bridge. Compare their supported transfer types, asset compatibility, integration requirements, and features to determine the best solution for your cross-chain needs.
| Criteria | Connect | NTT | Token Bridge | |
| Supported Transfer Types | Token Transfers |  |
|
|
| Token Transfers with Message Payloads |  |
|
|
|
| Supported Assets | Wrapped Assets | |
|
|
| Native Assets | |
|
|
|
| ERC-721s (NFTs) | |
|
|
|
| Features | Out-of-the-Box UI | |
|
|
| Event-Based Actions | |
|
|
|
| Integration Details | ||||
| Requirements | Contract Deployment | |
|
|
| User-Owned Contracts | |
|
|
|
| Ecosystem Support | Integrates with Other Products | |
|
|
| Ease of Integration | Implementation Complexity |   Low |
Moderate |
Moderate |
| Technology | Supported Languages | JavaScript, TypeScript | Solidity (Ethereum), Rust (Solana) | Solidity (Ethereum), Rust (Solana), TypeScript |